The voyage entry calls privacy-hygiene an 'audit rule' run by abcd's 'own audit'; the lint chapter says that verb is a lint and that 'audit' is reserved

The voyage entry calls privacy-hygiene an 'audit rule' run by abcd's 'own audit'; the lint chapter says that verb is a lint and that 'audit' is reserved

A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/voyage.md:35 — "own privacy-hygiene audit rule flags those in committed files"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/16-lint.md:19 — "The verb applies rules about form, which adr-40's vocabulary names a lint"

The lint chapter says the conformance verb applies rules about form, which adr-40's vocabulary names a lint, and that /abcd:audit is reserved for itd-16's hash-chain fidelity surface. privacy-hygiene is a rule of that lint. voyage.md calls it 'abcd's own privacy-hygiene audit rule' and says an in-tree voyage 'would have made abcd fail its own audit', which uses the reserved word for the lint.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 602.