This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-142 names entailment as one of four question regimes; 23-reading makes entailment a position whose regime is explicative.

issueopenminoriss-2610262036033754

itd-142 names entailment as one of four question regimes; 23-reading makes entailment a position whose regime is explicative.

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-142-the-brief-creation-interview-abcd.md:60 — "Four question regimes — narrative / options / entailment / defaults"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/23-reading.md:194 — "that its articulation does not state? | explicative |"

itd-142 lists four question regimes: narrative, options, entailment and defaults. In 23-reading a regime is the supply regime a reading's definition declares, and the entailment position's row gives its regime as explicative, so entailment is a position and not a regime. The two documents use regime for different things and put entailment on opposite sides of the position/regime distinction.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 620.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262036033754
typeissue
lifecycleopen
severityminor

References1