This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-84 types a proposal's relation to existing records as supersedes/reverses/duplicates/refines; ideate's record grill types the same relation as covered/contradicted/superseded.

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262036101369

itd-84 types a proposal's relation to existing records as supersedes/reverses/duplicates/refines; ideate's record grill types the same relation as covered/contradicted/superseded.

A naming conflict (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-84-intent-decomposition.md:118 — "Typed cross-record links (supersedes / reverses / duplicates / refines)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/18-ideate.md:46 — "carrying a relation (covered / contradicted / superseded)"

itd-84 requires typed cross-record links (supersedes, reverses, duplicates, refines) for the existing records a new proposal touches. 18-ideate's record grill records hits on the existing record carrying a relation of covered, contradicted or superseded. Both judge a new proposal against the existing record, yet name the same relation with two closed vocabularies (duplicates and covered, reverses and contradicted).

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 629.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. Capture's typed links (duplicates, refines, in internal/core/record/match) state a new record's relation to existing ones, while ideate's record-grill relation states how an existing record bears on an idea (covered, contradicted, superseded). No record or code requires one closed set, so this is a naming parallel, not a conflict.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262036101369
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severitynitpick

References1

mentions1