This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The lint chapter reserves /abcd:audit for itd-16's hash-chain fidelity surface and calls the conformance check abcd lint; itd-85, the intent the chapter cites, ships that same check as abcd audit.

issueopenmajoriss-2610262036142715

The lint chapter reserves /abcd:audit for itd-16's hash-chain fidelity surface and calls the conformance check abcd lint; itd-85, the intent the chapter cites, ships that same check as abcd audit.

A naming conflict (severity major) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/16-lint.md:20 — "/abcd:audit stays reserved for itd-16's hash-chain fidelity surface."
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-85-audit-verb.md:16 — "abcd ships abcd audit — a read-only check that tells you, in one command, whether a repository follows the working conventions"

16-lint says the conformance verb applies rules about form and so is a lint, and that /abcd:audit stays reserved for itd-16's hash-chain fidelity surface, where the staged chain and lifeboat verbs belong. itd-85 announces the same read-only repo-conformance check, with the same five v1 rules, as a new abcd audit verb with its own commands/audit.md. So one name, audit, is given to two different surfaces, and building itd-85 as written would collide with the reserved one.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 633.

Deferral 2026-10-27

Deferred past v0.15.1: Deferred by the product thinker on 2026-10-27 (dcn-2610271112330536): the brief's single-home rewrite (dcn-2610271112339516, dcn-2610271112330235) rewrites or removes most of the passages this record quotes.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262036142715
typeissue
lifecycleopen
severitymajor

References1

mentions4