itd-87 treats matching captures against dispositioned entries, not only open ones, as new work; the reading chapter says capture's filing-time match already compares with open and resolved issues.

itd-87 treats matching captures against dispositioned entries, not only open ones, as new work; the reading chapter says capture's filing-time match already compares with open and resolved issues.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/23-reading.md:314 — "with the open and resolved issues, the intents and every earlier reading item"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-87-recurrence-escalation-in-capture.md:31 — "Matching an incoming capture against dispositioned entries (resolve, wontfix), not merely against open ones."

23-reading says the ingest runs capture's filing-time match, with capture's threshold and configuration, comparing each item with the open and resolved issues, and that a confirmed recurrence is the disposition's recurs citation. itd-87 scopes as new work the matching of an incoming capture against dispositioned entries, not merely against open ones. Both cannot describe today's matcher: either it already reaches resolved records or it does not.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 635.