Development record
The decide chapter makes abcd decide with the ADR flag the ADR store's minting verb, with embark counting only as a restore; itd-44 adds capture as a second path that writes new ADRs into the store.
The decide chapter makes abcd decide with the ADR flag the ADR store's minting verb, with embark counting only as a restore; itd-44 adds capture as a second path that writes new ADRs into the store.
A scope leakage (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/24-decide.md:16— "minting verb, the counterpart of the read-onlyabcd adr-Ndispatch" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-44-fourth-intent-kind-decision.md:120— "A confirmeddecisionverdict DIVERTS capture"
24-decide names abcd decide with the ADR flag as the store's minting verb, the counterpart of the read-only adr dispatch, and accepts embark as another writer only because embark restores rather than mints. itd-44 has capture, on a confirmed decision verdict, write a new ADR into .abcd/development/decisions/adrs/. Two verbs would then mint ADRs, and the draft does not route through the decide mint.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 638.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262036186092 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262036186092-the-decide-chapter-makes-abcd-decide.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-44A Capture-Time `decision` Verdict That Routes Infrastructure Choices Into The Existing ADR Storerelated