itd-60 names the shipped docs-currency lint `abcd docs lint`; the lint chapter says the docs verb's former check sub-verb is an unknown command

itd-60 names the shipped docs-currency lint abcd docs lint; the lint chapter says the docs verb's former check sub-verb is an unknown command

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/16-lint.md:44 — "The docs and site verbs' former check sub-verbs are unknown commands"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-60-doc-fidelity-anti-drift.md:151 — "abcd docs lint — change-narration, resolvable cross-links, no stray root documents"

itd-60 calls the docs-currency lint abcd docs lint and says it 'runs everywhere already'. The lint chapter makes that lint the docs target of the one lint (abcd lint docs) and says the docs and site verbs' former check sub-verbs are unknown commands. So the spelling itd-60 gives is the one the binary refuses: one surface, two command names, and only one of them resolves.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 675.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The later shipped intent removed the docs verb's check sub-verb and the lint chapter says so; itd-60's spelling was correct when it shipped.