Development record

itd-6 says abcd never spawns Claude Code subprocesses; the guard chapter describes agents that abcd starts through its claude runner

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262036514870

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/17-guard.md:385 — "An agent abcd starts through its claude runner has no terminal"
End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-6-rp-mcp-only-integration.md:53 — "Spawning Claude Code subprocesses with claude -p — explicitly NOT how abcd works; abcd is the consumer, not the spawner"

itd-6 rules out spawning Claude Code subprocesses with claude -p as 'explicitly NOT how abcd works', saying abcd is the consumer and not the spawner. The guard chapter describes agents abcd starts through its own claude runner: headless launches carrying their own command line, settings and MCP server, plus a second, opencode, runner. The two disagree on whether abcd launches harness processes at all.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 679.

Grounds

declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. internal/core/runner starts harness processes today; the later shipped intent and ADR are the records that moved the boundary, and 34-build.md names the host-delegated reversal openly.

Frontmatter

id	iss-2610262036514870
type	issue
lifecycle	wontfix
severity	minor

.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262036514870-itd-6-says-abcd-never-spawns-claude-code.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗

References1

itd-6RepoPrompt over MCP is one opt-in reviewer route, beside the host's own agentsrelated

mentions1

dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.