The lab discipline lets no candidate into a harvest before a refutation pass; the lab verb's harvest lists candidates nobody tried to refute and only flags them.

The lab discipline lets no candidate into a harvest before a refutation pass; the lab verb's harvest lists candidates nobody tried to refute and only flags them.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/31-lab.md:103 — "and flagged where no refutation was attempted"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-2609251624540864-a-lab-runs-one-procedure-from-intention.md:119 — "no candidate enters the harvest before a refutation pass"

itd-2609251624540864 makes a refutation pass a precondition for a candidate entering the harvest. 31-lab says its procedure is that discipline, yet its harvest lists every product finding as a capture candidate and only flags those where no refutation was attempted. So the harvest the verb builds can hold exactly the candidates the procedure forbids.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 707.