itd-1 says a shipped intent's Audit Notes come only from an audit run by hand, because the automatic audit at ship time is deferred; the build loop already runs that audit and ingests it when the intent ships.

itd-1 says a shipped intent's Audit Notes come only from an audit run by hand, because the automatic audit at ship time is deferred; the build loop already runs that audit and ingests it when the intent ships.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:45 — "Until that lands, a shipped intent's ## Audit Notes is populated only when /abcd:intent audit is run by hand."
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/34-build.md:743 — "runs the spec's close (which ships the intent and parks the fidelity receipt) and ingests the verdict of the audit the lane took into that receipt"

itd-1 defers automatic invocation on the planned-to-shipped move and says that until then, Audit Notes are filled only when /abcd:intent audit is run by hand. In 34-build, the landing runs the spec close that ships the intent, then ingests the verdict of the intent-auditor the lane already ran. That is an automatic audit at exactly that move, so 'only when run by hand' cannot also hold.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 708.