The decision-adapter intent needs lab harvest to report agreement rates with probability bands; the lab brief's harvest only assembles prose sections from findings and probe records

The decision-adapter intent needs lab harvest to report agreement rates with probability bands; the lab brief's harvest only assembles prose sections from findings and probe records

A sequencing impossibility (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609221009495079-abcd-s-typed-judgements-can-run-through.md:45 — "abcd lab harvest produces agreement rates per type with counts and probability bands"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/31-lab.md:99 — "assembles the lab's harvest in the lifeboat's section shape — intention, method, what worked, what is open, candidates, coverage — from the INTENTION, the findings log and the probe records"

The intent's evidence for turning a judgement type on is the agreement rates per type, with counts and probability bands, that abcd lab harvest produces from pairs the adapter recorded. In the lab chapter, the harvest assembles the lifeboat's sections from the INTENTION, the findings log and the probe records, and computes no statistics. The lab verbs run nothing either, because whoever runs the lab runs each probe. As the lab is written, its harvest cannot produce the figures this intent depends on.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 733.

Grounds

• pursued: the harvest's agreement section is the evidence path the intent names; shown wrong if a lab holding pairs harvests without per-type counts and bands