This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The model-tier intent says nothing reads the oracle setting and every delegated step goes where the harness picks; the build brief reads oracle.review to route a lane's reviews

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262037365749

The model-tier intent says nothing reads the oracle setting and every delegated step goes where the harness picks; the build brief reads oracle.review to route a lane's reviews

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609170822093401-the-oracle-choice-is-one-repo-wide-value.md:26 — "backend is one repo-wide value that nothing reads, and every delegated step"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/34-build.md:544 — "oracle.review in the layered configuration names host, the bundled default, or rp"

The intent's press release starts from the premise that the oracle backend is a single repo-wide value nothing reads, so every delegated step reaches whatever model the harness picks. The build chapter says oracle.review in the layered configuration sends a build lane's ruthless and security reviews to rp instead of the host. The setting is read, and not every delegated step goes to the harness's choice.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 735.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Both statements were true when written; the setting the intent calls unread is still unread, and the setting the build chapter reads is another one.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262037365749
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1