Development record
itd-50 calls the fidelity verdict's agent intent-fidelity-reviewer; 34-build names the same validator intent-auditor
itd-50 calls the fidelity verdict's agent intent-fidelity-reviewer; 34-build names the same validator intent-auditor
A naming conflict (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-50-loop-toward-acceptance.md:25— "theintent-fidelity-reviewerrecords aNOT_METverdict" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/34-build.md:684— "intent-auditor. The fidelity audit runs once, on that lane"
itd-50's press release says the intent-fidelity-reviewer records the NOT_MET verdict that its loop acts on. 34-build gives that role on the closing lane, which writes the per-criterion fidelity verdict, to an agent named intent-auditor. These are two names for one agent, and a builder wiring itd-50's loop would look for a definition that the build loop does not dispatch.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 744.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262031563379. Same End A (itd-50 line 25 names intent-fidelity-reviewer); 34-build.md names the same role intent-auditor.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262037438474 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262037438474-itd-50-calls-the-fidelity-verdict-s.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-50The Audit Loop Drives An Intent To Acceptance — Or Calls For A Replanrelated
mentions2
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.
- iss-2610262031563379itd-50 calls the per-criterion auditor intent-fidelity-reviewer; the brief names the same role intent-auditor (Role 1).