itd-147 rules that a surface chapter's hand-written prose never states a sub-verb; 27-implement states its sub-verbs above the generated appendix in a table and in prose

itd-147 rules that a surface chapter's hand-written prose never states a sub-verb; 27-implement states its sub-verbs above the generated appendix in a table and in prose

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-147-the-brief-s-surface-chapters-are-a.md:90 — "the prose above it never states a flag or sub-verb"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/27-implement.md:498 — "The outage sub-verb renders it, and its own sub-verbs report a loss"

Shipped itd-147 makes the generated appendix the only place a chapter states flags and sub-verbs: the prose above it never states a flag or sub-verb. 27-implement keeps a hand-maintained sub-verb table above the appendix marker. The table lists join through outage clear, with outage record, probe, ack and clear among them. Its prose also names sub-verbs directly, for example the outage sub-verb and its own sub-verbs. Each sub-verb is therefore stated twice, once by hand and once generated. That is the duplication itd-147 says it removes by construction.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 749.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. 27-implement keeps the exempt table and names sub-verbs in words, which the current rule allows.