Development record
itd-6 selects the reviewer route with `oracle.backend` (rp, codex, in-session); 34-build selects it with `oracle.review` (host, rp)
itd-6 selects the reviewer route with oracle.backend (rp, codex, in-session); 34-build selects it with oracle.review (host, rp)
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-6-rp-mcp-only-integration.md:43— "If reachable: lockoracle.backend = "rp". If not: lockoracle.backend = "codex"(if Codex CLI present) or"in-session"(final fallback)" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/34-build.md:544— "oracle.reviewin the layered configuration nameshost, the bundled default, orrp"
itd-6 has the route locked as oracle.backend with the values rp, codex or in-session, while 34-build reads the same choice of reviewer route from oracle.review, whose only values are host (the bundled default) and rp. One setting carries two key names and two value sets, so a configuration written to one document's key is not the one the other reads.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 768.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. internal/core/oracle/review.go reads oracle.review with host (default) or rp; oracle.backend is a separate recorded choice that routes nothing; itd-6's own re-file note and Acceptance Criteria already use oracle.review.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262038033829 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262038033829-itd-6-selects-the-reviewer-route-with.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-6RepoPrompt over MCP is one opt-in reviewer route, beside the host's own agentsrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.