This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-6 falls an unreachable RepoPrompt through Codex and then an in-session subagent; 34-build falls a review the rp route does not return straight back to the host

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262038043808

itd-6 falls an unreachable RepoPrompt through Codex and then an in-session subagent; 34-build falls a review the rp route does not return straight back to the host

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-6-rp-mcp-only-integration.md:42 — "if RP MCP is unreachable, abcd falls through to Codex if configured, then in-session subagent. Three-step cascade."
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/34-build.md:566 — "the call records one fallback receipt (the role, asked: rp, the reason, abcd's detail, ran: host) in the state and the record"

itd-6 states a three-step cascade when RP MCP is unreachable: Codex if configured, then an in-session subagent. 34-build states that a review the rp route does not return records one fallback receipt with ran: host and hands the host the same brief and return path, with no Codex step between. The two cannot both describe what happens when RepoPrompt cannot be reached.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 769.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The Codex-then-subagent cascade is dropped by itd-6 itself; its Acceptance Criteria state the host fallback that 34-build and the loop code (fallback receipt, ran host) implement.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262038043808
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1