Development record
Universal patterns say an explicit `<seam>.backend` value selects a wired backend for history, spec, run and scanner; the configuration chapter lists those selectors as staged keys no code reads.
Universal patterns say an explicit <seam>.backend value selects a wired backend for history, spec, run and scanner; the configuration chapter lists those selectors as staged keys no code reads.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:181— "An explicit value selects a wired external backend (richer capability, unusual setups, or testing)." - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/03-configuration.md:382— "No shipped code reads any of the keys below."
04-universal-patterns describes backend resolution through <seam>.backend for the history, spec, run and scanner seams, with an explicit value selecting a wired external backend. 03-configuration puts spec.backend, run.backend and history.backend under staged config keys and says no shipped code reads any of them, and nothing chooses between backends. Writing such a key either selects a backend or has no effect.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 779.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262038129584 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262038129584-universal-patterns-say-an-explicit-seam.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗