Development record
Owed-review draining is described twice: staged run-seam gating that drains nothing today, and a shipped `intent audit --owed` that drains the owed set.
Owed-review draining is described twice: staged run-seam gating that drains nothing today, and a shipped intent audit --owed that drains the owed set.
A scope leakage (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/03-configuration.md:409— "seam ships, so nothing drains today. When it does, owed intent audits drain at" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/01-agents.md:154— "drains the owed set). Either way the close stands"
03-configuration assigns draining owed intent audits to the run seam's receipt gating and says no run seam ships, so nothing drains today. 01-agents says abcd intent audit --owed drains the owed set. The two chapters claim the same job and contradict each other on whether anything does it now.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 783.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262038166170 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262038166170-owed-review-draining-is-described-twice.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗