Development record
The memory-note entry says a promoted note goes into the project's rules; the configuration chapter puts promoted notes in the project's own `memory.json` layer.
The memory-note entry says a promoted note goes into the project's rules; the configuration chapter puts promoted notes in the project's own memory.json layer.
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/memory-note.md:31— "A note that has been recalled in several sessions is promoted into the project's rules" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/03-configuration.md:792— "memory.json(the layer the prompt router recalls above the machine's"
memory-note.md's example has a note recalled across sessions promoted into the project's rules. 03-configuration says the project's memory notes live in .abcd/memory.json, a layer the prompt router recalls above the machine's memory.json, separate from rules.json. So promotion has two different destinations.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 799.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262038308994 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262038308994-the-memory-note-entry-says-a-promoted.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2610262040599781The glossary sends a promoted memory note into the project's rules; the intent keeps promoted notes in `.abcd/memory.json`, apart from the rules people curate.