Development record
itd-5 calls the prompt linter lint_prompts; 05-prompt-quality calls the one shipped prompt-tree rule agent_contract
itd-5 calls the prompt linter lint_prompts; 05-prompt-quality calls the one shipped prompt-tree rule agent_contract
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-5-prompt-quality-additions.md:23— "lint_promptsvalidates set-membership against thetask_classesenum ininternal/core/lint" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/05-prompt-quality.md:26— "agent_contract, ininternal/core/lint, is record-lint's dedicated rule for the agent-prompt tree."
itd-5 says the lint_prompts check validates task_classes set-membership in internal/core/lint. 05-prompt-quality says agent_contract is record-lint's dedicated rule for the agent-prompt tree, and that the membership check is staged. One linter has two names, and the two documents also disagree about what it checks.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 813.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262038425929 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262038425929-itd-5-calls-the-prompt-linter-lint.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-5Every Agent Prompt Carries Its Version, Earns Its Lock, And Survives Injectionrelated
mentions1
- iss-2610262031338081itd-5 has lint_prompts validate task_classes against an enum in internal/core/lint; the naming register says the binary carries no such schema