Development record
itd-25 says other agents have RepoPrompt and Codex CLI alternatives; 02-adapters routes only a build lane's two reviews off the host
itd-25 says other agents have RepoPrompt and Codex CLI alternatives; 02-adapters routes only a build lane's two reviews off the host
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-25-dredge-cross-corpus-synthesist.md:43— "Oracle backend chain (same as other agents): host-delegated by default, with the opt-in RepoPrompt adapter and Codex CLI as configured alternatives" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/02-adapters.md:191— "A build lane's ruthless and security reviews, which the validate stage hands to the host's own agents by default, can be routed elsewhere two ways."
itd-25 gives its agent a backend chain 'same as other agents', with RepoPrompt and Codex CLI as configured alternatives to the host. 02-adapters says only a build lane's ruthless and security reviews can be routed elsewhere, through a claude or opencode runner or through RepoPrompt. No other agent has the chain itd-25 says is standard.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 830.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262038572033 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262038572033-itd-25-says-other-agents-have-repoprompt.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-25Patterns Surface Themselvesrelated
mentions1
- iss-2610262043470447itd-25 says agents are host-delegated by default with RepoPrompt opt-in; itd-6 keeps RP MCP as the preferred first backend in the oracle chain