itd-2610170634394993 puts agents' work claims on the shared remote; 04-universal-patterns puts multi-agent claims in .abcd/coordination/

itd-2610170634394993 puts agents' work claims on the shared remote; 04-universal-patterns puts multi-agent claims in .abcd/coordination/

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2610170634394993-several-headless-agents-work-one.md:22 — "Each agent takes a piece of work by a claim on the shared remote"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:139 — "Coordination state (file locks like shape.lock, multi-agent claims per itd-33) lives at .abcd/coordination/"

The headless-agents intent has each agent take work by a claim on the shared remote, on the stance that coordination lives there. 04-universal-patterns puts multi-agent claims at .abcd/coordination/ in the checkout, with a committed append-log beside local lock files. The two documents give the same claims two incompatible homes.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 837.