This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-59 puts the transcript corpus at `~/.abcd.noindex/history/<root_sha>/`, but the configuration page puts it in the sibling store `~/.abcd.noindex/transcripts/<root-sha>/`

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262039086156

itd-59 puts the transcript corpus at ~/.abcd.noindex/history/<root_sha>/, but the configuration page puts it in the sibling store ~/.abcd.noindex/transcripts/<root-sha>/

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-59-autonomous-worker-transcript-capture.md:19 — "an operator's interactive session is redirected into the native transcript corpus at ~/.abcd.noindex/history/<root_sha>/"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/03-configuration.md:463 — "at ~/.abcd.noindex/transcripts/<root-sha>/, holding redacted records and a"

itd-59 exists to feed autonomous-run transcripts into the corpus it places under history/, and it keeps that path as-is. The configuration page says the history store holds the repository registry, and that the transcript corpus is a sibling store at transcripts/<root-sha>/, not part of the registry's tree. The two documents name different directories for the same corpus, so a build from itd-59 would write where no transcript resolver reads.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 841.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262033019185. Same draft edit as iss-2610262033019185, set against a different statement of the same current state.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262039086156
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2