itd-34 ships a shape-classification role that runs from the pre-commit hook and `/abcd:intent shape`; 01-agents says the role is a design target with no `shape` sub-verb.

itd-34 ships a shape-classification role that runs from the pre-commit hook and /abcd:intent shape; 01-agents says the role is a design target with no shape sub-verb.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/01-agents.md:176 — "shape sub-verb is registered, and no cached suggestions exist for bare"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:90 — "It runs continuously via the pre-commit hook (writing findings to the latest report) and on-demand via /abcd:intent shape."

itd-34 is in shipped/. Its scope says the third role runs continuously from the pre-commit hook and on demand through /abcd:intent shape, and that bare /abcd:intent shows cached suggestions. 01-agents says the kind-classification role is a design target, that no shape sub-verb is registered and that no cached suggestions exist. Both cannot be accurate: one is a shipped record promising a surface, the other is the catalogue saying it was never built.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 884.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The shipped record itself says the role was not part of its delivery, so the two agree when read in full.