Development record
itd-2609212137129937 bans 'maintainer' in every lint root, the command pages and rules included; 06-lint limits docs-lint to `docs/` and the repo-root prose.
itd-2609212137129937 bans 'maintainer' in every lint root, the command pages and rules included; 06-lint limits docs-lint to docs/ and the repo-root prose.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/06-lint.md:10— "lintsdocs/and the repo-root prose for change-narration" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609212137129937-abcd-s-own-text-names-the-product.md:40— "the docs-lint banned-token list gains the word for every lint root including the command pages and the rules"
itd-2609212137129937 (shipped) says the docs-lint banned-token list gains the word for every lint root, the command pages and the rules included. 06-lint says docs-currency (abcd lint docs) covers docs/ and the repo-root prose, and that record-lint covers .abcd/development/. Neither root includes commands/ or the rules files. Either those are lint roots and 06-lint understates the reach, or the ban does not cover them.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 899.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262039584858 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262039584858-itd-2609212137129937-bans-maintainer-in.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2609212137129937abcd's text names the product thinker or the technical facilitator, never the maintainerrelated