02-adapters sends spec-tied reviews to a native spec review store; itd-28 dropped that store, so the dated folders and gate receipts are the store.

02-adapters sends spec-tied reviews to a native spec review store; itd-28 dropped that store, so the dated folders and gate receipts are the store.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/02-adapters.md:284 — "spec-tied reviews go straight to the native spec"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-28-rp-reviews-into-flow.md:112 — "the dated review folders and the gate receipts are the store"

02-adapters' RepoPrompt harvesting section says spec-tied reviews go straight to the native spec review store and are never swept, and its reviews reader reads spec-tied reviews beside the charter folders. itd-28's first decision drops the review store its scope described, so the dated review folders and the gate receipts are the store. Its third decision says no abcd verb files a dated folder. The brief names a store that the shipped intent removed.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 902.