This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-2609091034175565 says a person sees reservations through `abcd peers`; the README lists `peers` as a verb for agents and hosts only.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262040016204

itd-2609091034175565 says a person sees reservations through abcd peers; the README lists peers as a verb for agents and hosts only.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/README.md:152 — "lint, memory, mode, peers, reflect, report, reserve"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609091034175565-nothing-tells-an-agent-that-a-record-it.md:267 — "a person sees reservations through abcd peers and the record and board renders."

itd-2609091034175565's decision 39 hides reserve from the person and says a person sees reservations through abcd peers and the record and board renders. The README puts peers in the agents-and-hosts block, whose rule is that only a command no person types belongs there, and hides that block's pages from a person's /abcd: menu. The verb named as the person's view is one the placement says no person types. The README now gives that view to /abcd:status.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 903.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The later ruling names the person's verb, and commands/peers.md is block agents while commands/status.md is block people.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262040016204
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1