Development record
The help register names the verdict ingest `intent audit ingest`; itd-80 names it `intent review ingest`
issuewontfixminoriss-2610262040043356
The help register names the verdict ingest intent audit ingest; itd-80 names it intent review ingest
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/README.md:152— "intent audit ingest,intent consistency ingest,intent prepass" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:32— "abcd intent review ingestingests a verdict."
The README's help table lists intent audit ingest beside intent consistency ingest as the verbs agents and hosts call. itd-80, which delivered the fidelity-verdict ingest, names it abcd intent review ingest. That is two names for one verb, and someone building from itd-80 would type a verb the help does not list.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 907.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The rename is recorded and the command page and register carry the current spelling.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262040043356 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262040043356-the-help-register-names-the-verdict.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-80An Intent Ships Itself: `planned → shipped` Follows Its Spec Closing, With A Fidelity Audit Attachedrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.