Development record
The adapters chapter says the RepoPrompt route opens a new chat for each reviewer; itd-6 requires re-reviews to stay in the same RP chat, never a new one
The adapters chapter says the RepoPrompt route opens a new chat for each reviewer; itd-6 requires re-reviews to stay in the same RP chat, never a new one
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/02-adapters.md:239— "withnew_chat: truewhen the tool declares it, so each reviewer is fresh." - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-6-rp-mcp-only-integration.md:45— "never--new-chat, never freshrp builder"
02-adapters says the RepoPrompt adapter runs one MCP session per review and sends new_chat: true when the tool declares it, so each reviewer starts fresh. itd-6 says a re-review after fixes must stay in the same RP chat, never --new-chat, and carries the chat_id from one call to the next. A route that always opens a fresh chat cannot keep a re-review in the same chat.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 913.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The shipped record itself says which holds; a one-line amendment of its re-filed paragraph would be optional tidying, not a contradiction to fix.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262040093616 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262040093616-the-adapters-chapter-says-the-repoprompt.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-6RepoPrompt over MCP is one opt-in reviewer route, beside the host's own agentsrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.