Development record
Universal patterns put the consistency pass's report on the reviews shelf under .abcd/work/reviews/; itd-48 lands it under the retired .abcd/logbook/audit/
Universal patterns put the consistency pass's report on the reviews shelf under .abcd/work/reviews/; itd-48 lands it under the retired .abcd/logbook/audit/
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:123— "reviews shelf, .abcd/work/reviews/< date>-consistency[-< itd-N>]/, not here)" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-48-intent-fidelity-reviewer-roles-2-3.md:77— "Reports land at.abcd/logbook/audit/consistency-<ts>/report.{json,md}"
04-universal-patterns says the itd-48 consistency pass files its report on the reviews shelf at .abcd/work/reviews/< date>-consistency[-< itd-N>]/, not in the log tier. The same section says the .abcd/logbook/ root was retired and must not be minted again. itd-48 says its reports land at .abcd/logbook/audit/consistency-<ts>/report.{json,md}. The report cannot sit in both places, and one of them is a retired name.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 920.
Grounds
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262040161220 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262040161220-universal-patterns-put-the-consistency.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-48`intent-fidelity-reviewer` Gains Its Cross-Doc And Kind-Classification Rolesrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.