This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

Universal patterns put the consistency pass's report on the reviews shelf under .abcd/work/reviews/; itd-48 lands it under the retired .abcd/logbook/audit/

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262040161220

Universal patterns put the consistency pass's report on the reviews shelf under .abcd/work/reviews/; itd-48 lands it under the retired .abcd/logbook/audit/

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:123 — "reviews shelf, .abcd/work/reviews/< date>-consistency[-< itd-N>]/, not here)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-48-intent-fidelity-reviewer-roles-2-3.md:77 — "Reports land at .abcd/logbook/audit/consistency-<ts>/report.{json,md}"

04-universal-patterns says the itd-48 consistency pass files its report on the reviews shelf at .abcd/work/reviews/< date>-consistency[-< itd-N>]/, not in the log tier. The same section says the .abcd/logbook/ root was retired and must not be minted again. itd-48 says its reports land at .abcd/logbook/audit/consistency-<ts>/report.{json,md}. The report cannot sit in both places, and one of them is a retired name.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 920.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Code tests expect .abcd/work/reviews/ followed by the date and -consistency; the shipped intent's old path was true when written and the brief names the current one.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262040161220
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1