Universal patterns call itd-60 a planned draft that is not yet built; itd-60 is shipped, and its gate refuses at spec close

Universal patterns call itd-60 a planned draft that is not yet built; itd-60 is shipped, and its gate refuses at spec close

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:144 — "(intents/planned/itd-60-doc-fidelity-anti-drift.md; not yet built)"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-60-doc-fidelity-anti-drift.md:124 — "abcd spec close, the verb that moves a planned intent to shipped/, refuses per intent while the brief lags the surface that intent delivered"

04-universal-patterns describes the doc-fidelity pass as planned under a draft itd-60 at intents/planned/ and not yet built, and plans its log-tier layout as a later addition. itd-60 sits in shipped/ and says abcd spec close refuses per intent while the brief lags the surface it delivered. The gate cannot be both unbuilt and enforcing at the close.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 921.