The build sequence says itd-27's grilling is now the planning interview; the glossary README keeps /abcd:intent grill as a live itd-27 design target.

The build sequence says itd-27's grilling is now the planning interview; the glossary README keeps /abcd:intent grill as a live itd-27 design target.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/01-build-sequence.md:100 — "the grilling itd-27 asked for is the planning interview"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/README.md:174 — "/abcd:intent grill is a design target (itd-27)"

The build sequence says there is no grill sub-verb because the grilling itd-27 asked for is now the planning interview, under itd-94, which supersedes it. The glossary README calls /abcd:intent grill a design target of itd-27 and specifies its glossary-aware write-back. A design target cannot rest on an intent that another intent has superseded with a different surface.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 929.