Development record
itd-2610070550516046 makes the product thinker's stored order decide what is built next; record-families says sequence comes only from dependencies and the shelves.
itd-2610070550516046 makes the product thinker's stored order decide what is built next; record-families says sequence comes only from dependencies and the shelves.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-2610070550516046-on-abcd-s-dashboard-a-product-thinker.md:44— "The product thinker's order decides what is built next" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/record-families.md:30— "Sequencing is dependencies (blocked_by,builds_on) plus the shelves; nothing sits above the intent for sequence."
The draft rules that an ordering the product thinker sets decides what is built next, until it is reset. record-families says sequencing is dependencies plus the lifecycle shelves, that how-soon is derived and never stored, and that nothing sits above the intent for sequence. An order the product thinker records is a stored sequence from neither source. The draft reconciles itself with itd-2609211116005482 but not with this page.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 950.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262040426321 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262040426321-itd-2610070550516046-makes-the-product.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2610070550516046On the dashboard, a product thinker sees the brief and their ideas together, and puts the ideas in orderrelated
mentions1
- itd-2609211116005482`abcd build next` picks the readiest planned intent itself, and writes down why