This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The glossary makes planning the product thinker's sign-off and never unattended; the build intent adds `--auto-plan`, which plans with no human.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262040570378

The glossary makes planning the product thinker's sign-off and never unattended; the build intent adds --auto-plan, which plans with no human.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/plan.md:19 — "sign-off on an intent's acceptance criteria — never run unattended"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609201916151817-one-verb-takes-a-single-intent-from.md:68 — "it lets the planning path run without a human"

plan.md defines moving a draft to planned/ as the product thinker's sign-off on the acceptance criteria, never run unattended and never inferred. itd-2609201916151817 decision 6 adds an agent path, implement --auto-plan, that takes a draft through planning with no human and replaces the sign-off with recorded decisions and review receipts. The two documents disagree on whether planning can ever happen without the sign-off.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 966.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. plan.md describes the act abcd intent plan, which the planned intent leaves human-only; the unattended path is a separate, unbuilt flag whose reversal is already queued as its own ADR. The two documents do not disagree about anything that ships.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262040570378
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1