The manual-hold draft relies on a run-seam selector that already skips blocked specs; the build sequence says the run seam does not ship.

The manual-hold draft relies on a run-seam selector that already skips blocked specs; the build sequence says the run seam does not ship.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/01-build-sequence.md:141 — "The seam does not ship: the binary registers no run verb"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-57-manual-hold-sentinel.md:17 — "the run seam's selector already skips specs blocked by a non-done dependency, which does the rest"

itd-57 says it needs no new logic because the run seam's selector already skips specs with a non-done dependency. 01-build-sequence.md says the seam does not ship: no run verb, the run adapter only planned. The draft's hold depends on a selector that does not exist.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 983.