The brief-change derivation draft reuses 'the existing grill's interrogation machinery'; the verification matrix says nothing of the grill ships.

The brief-change derivation draft reuses 'the existing grill's interrogation machinery'; the verification matrix says nothing of the grill ships.

A sequencing impossibility (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/02-verification-matrix.md:78 — "nothing of itd-27's interview ships: intent registers no grill sub-verb"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-61-brief-change-derivation.md:40 — "Reuse of the existing grill's interrogation machinery rather than a parallel re-implementation."

itd-61 builds its derivation pass by reusing the grill's interrogation machinery instead of writing its own. The matrix's Grill row is staged in full: no grill sub-verb is registered and nothing of itd-27's interview ships. The draft depends on machinery that does not exist.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 988.