The dependency-graph draft lints phase scoping against blockers; the record-families page says nothing sits above the intent for sequence.

The dependency-graph draft lints phase scoping against blockers; the record-families page says nothing sits above the intent for sequence.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/record-families.md:30 — "Sequencing is dependencies (blocked_by, builds_on) plus the shelves; nothing sits above the intent for sequence."
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-78-intent-dependency-graph.md:17 — "a phase that scopes an intent before its blocker's phase"

record-families.md says sequencing is only dependencies plus the shelves, with nothing above the intent. itd-78 proposes a deterministic lint failure for 'a phase that scopes an intent before its blocker's phase', a check that needs phase scoping the record no longer has.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 987.