The memory chapter names the recall diagnostic a `recall` sub-verb of `abcd library`; itd-39 rules that the same diagnostic is `abcd rules --prompt` on the rules verb

The memory chapter names the recall diagnostic a recall sub-verb of abcd library; itd-39 rules that the same diagnostic is abcd rules --prompt on the rules verb

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/07-memory.md:197 — "A recall [keyword] sub-verb of abcd library would show which pages a prompt or keyword surfaces"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-39-scope-aware-memory-retrieval.md:78 — "is abcd rules --prompt "<text>", on the existing rules verb"

Both documents describe one diagnostic: show which memory pages a prompt or keyword would surface, and in which bracket. The memory chapter places it as a recall [keyword] sub-verb of abcd library. itd-39's 2026-10-11 decision rules it is abcd rules --prompt "<text>" on the existing rules verb. One capability carries two different command names, so someone building from the brief would add a library sub-verb the planned intent has ruled out.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 996.