This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-39 extends a Python script `hooks/prompt_router_hook.py`; the memory chapter says the prompt router is a binary sub-command, not a script file in `hooks/`

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262041234230

itd-39 extends a Python script hooks/prompt_router_hook.py; the memory chapter says the prompt router is a binary sub-command, not a script file in hooks/

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-39-scope-aware-memory-retrieval.md:33 — "hooks/prompt_router_hook.py (itd-3) is extended from rules-only to rules + memory."
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/07-memory.md:181 — "It is a sub-command of the abcd binary reached through the hook manifest, not a script file in hooks/."

itd-39's scope extends the prompt router by editing hooks/prompt_router_hook.py. The memory chapter says the router is a sub-command of the abcd binary, reached through the hook manifest, and explicitly not a script file in hooks/. The file the intent tells an implementer to change does not exist under the brief's description of the router.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 997.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262031560983. Same End A (itd-39 line 33); 07-memory.md says the router is a binary sub-command, as the code and hooks/user-prompt-submit.sh show.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262041234230
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions3