itd-180 gives the disposition record five states; the glossary defines a disposition as one of four states

itd-180 gives the disposition record five states; the glossary defines a disposition as one of four states

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-180-a-cold-reading-s-findings-land-as.md:57 — "five states, availability varying by position"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/README.md:270 — "in one of four states: accepted, rejected, declined or held."

itd-180 says the disposition record has five states whose availability varies by position, yet it enumerates only accepted, rejected, declined and held. The glossary's term index defines a disposition as one of four states: accepted, rejected, declined or held. The count of states the disposition schema admits cannot be both five and four, and a validator built from the intent's count would look for a state that does not exist.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1003.