This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

Shipped itd-24 has embark surface past retrospectives during its press-release interview; the verification matrix says embark's press-release interview is staged and what ships is probe-then-write

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262041301883

Shipped itd-24 has embark surface past retrospectives during its press-release interview; the verification matrix says embark's press-release interview is staged and what ships is probe-then-write

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-24-reflect-command.md:55 — "/abcd:embark from <path> surfaces predecessor retrospectives during the press-release interview"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/02-verification-matrix.md:62 — "What ships is probe-then-write with the coverage blanks a human must answer surfaced first"

itd-24 is shipped, and its scope says /abcd:embark from <path> surfaces predecessor retrospectives during the press-release interview, with its decision 2 ranking those lessons on embark. The verification matrix marks the embark press-release interview as staged, with no shipped surface: what ships is probe-then-write, and embark curates nothing. Embark cannot surface retrospectives inside an interview the brief says does not exist.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1005.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. retrospectives.go carries the lessons step; no embark interview ships.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262041301883
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1