This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-24 uses "voyage" for a project's lifetime of work; the glossary defines voyage as the operations namespace of disembark and embark runs and forbids it for a project

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262041318943

itd-24 uses "voyage" for a project's lifetime of work; the glossary defines voyage as the operations namespace of disembark and embark runs and forbids it for a project

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-24-reflect-command.md:55 — "of the voyage's retrospectives into the lifeboat"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/voyage.md:59 — "Do not use it for a "project" (too generic)"

itd-24 speaks of packing all of the voyage's retrospectives, and of a new or previous voyage, using voyage to mean a project's arc of releases. The glossary pins voyage to the operator-level operations namespace that records disembark and embark runs, and says not to use it for a project. adr-35 retired the lifecycle sense, and the entry's open question leaves it unnamed. Read with the glossary's meaning, "the voyage's retrospectives" names nothing that holds retrospectives.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1006.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Same cause as the 04-naming record; shipped intents are not rewritten to follow a later vocabulary.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262041318943
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2