The record-families page claims to be the one map of record families and lists seven; the reframe intent adds a reframe record family beside other reading families, none of which has a row

The record-families page claims to be the one map of record families and lists seven; the reframe intent adds a reframe record family beside other reading families, none of which has a row

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/record-families.md:36 — "a name that has no row here is a name nobody has justified"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609020625402518-a-reframe-occasioned-by-a-reading-is.md:42 — "A reframe record family"

The record-families page presents itself as the one page that maps abcd's record families (intent, spec, step, bundle, issue, release, status), and says a name with no row is a name nobody has justified. The shipped reframe intent creates a reframe record family in the working tier beside the other reading families (readings, dispositions, admissions, surprises), and none of them has a row. Either the map is incomplete or those families are unjustified. The two documents cannot both be right.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1012.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262040295570. Same root as the record-family set mismatch: the page claims to be the one map but omits ADRs, decisions and the reading-ledger families other chapters call record families.