Development record
The internals index calls the fidelity agent intent-auditor; itd-34 calls the same agent intent-fidelity-reviewer.
The internals index calls the fidelity agent intent-auditor; itd-34 calls the same agent intent-fidelity-reviewer.
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/README.md:20— "intent-auditorordocumentation-auditor" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:88— "intent-fidelity-reviewershape-classification role"
itd-34 identifies 'the same agent that performs single-document fidelity audits ... and cross-document fidelity audits' and names it intent-fidelity-reviewer. That agent is the one the 05-internals index and the rest of the brief call intent-auditor. One agent has two names, so a reader cannot tell whether itd-34's third role belongs to the shipped auditor or to another agent.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1029.
Grounds
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262041516427 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262041516427-the-internals-index-calls-the-fidelity.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-34Intents Promote In Three Flavours — Standalone, Bundle-Member, Disciplinerelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.