Development record
The spec glossary entry forbids 'epic' as a synonym; itd-34 has bundle members share an epic_id that holds a spec id.
The spec glossary entry forbids 'epic' as a synonym; itd-34 has bundle members share an epic_id that holds a spec id.
A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/spec.md:6— "forbidden_synonyms: ["sprint", "milestone", "project", "feature", "epic"]" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:44— "they share anepic_idand abundle: <bundle-id>frontmatter field"
The spec entry lists 'epic' among its forbidden synonyms, and the glossary README says this repository enforces that word. itd-34 has bundle members 'share an epic_id' and writes 'epic_id: spc-N' and 'epic.intent', which uses the forbidden word for a spec in the very frontmatter the bundle relies on.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1033.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. A shipped intent's frontmatter vocabulary from the flow-next design is not live prose, and no code reads epic_id; the glossary's forbidden word concerns current wording.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262041545005 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262041545005-the-spec-glossary-entry-forbids-epic-as.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-34Intents Promote In Three Flavours — Standalone, Bundle-Member, Disciplinerelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.