The site chapter says no repo-agnostic explorer claim is made until a second instance proves it; shipped itd-2609061543533170 claims the pages render for every managed repository.

The site chapter says no repo-agnostic explorer claim is made until a second instance proves it; shipped itd-2609061543533170 claims the pages render for every managed repository.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/10-site.md:109 — "the gate adr-47 decision 6 puts in front of any repo-agnostic claim, and the reason none is made here"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609061543533170-abcd-sets-up-a-managed-repository-s.md:43 — "landing, explorer, record pages, graph, timeline, glossary and status render for every managed repository from its own text"

10-site holds that genericity is demonstrated on a sparse second instance before it is claimed. It names itd-139's second-instance demonstration as the gate adr-47 sets in front of any repo-agnostic claim, and 'the reason none is made here'. The shipped site-setup intent makes that claim outright: the landing, explorer, record pages, graph, timeline, glossary and status render for every managed repository from its own text.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1042.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262035542834. Same contradiction as iss-2610262035542834 with the shipped intent in place of the 22-site.md chapter as the other end; the one itd-140 ruling resolves both.