itd-6 keeps a re-review in the same chat for every backend, the in-session subagent included; the verification matrix says consecutive host-delegated calls are independent dispatches.

itd-6 keeps a re-review in the same chat for every backend, the in-session subagent included; the verification matrix says consecutive host-delegated calls are independent dispatches.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-6-rp-mcp-only-integration.md:45 — "Same rule applies whether the backend is RP, Codex, or in-session subagent (in-session uses Task with continuation prompts)."
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/02-verification-matrix.md:34 — "Two consecutive calls are independent dispatches, so the audit-fix loop re-primes context every iteration"

itd-6 makes it a rule that a re-review after fixes MUST stay in the same chat, and applies the rule to the in-session subagent through continuation prompts. The matrix's default host-delegated oracle row says two consecutive calls are independent dispatches, so the audit-fix loop re-primes its context on every iteration. The default backend cannot both carry on the earlier conversation and start fresh each time.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1055.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The same-chat rule was never built here (the RP adapter opens a new chat when the tool takes one, and the host default re-dispatches), and the re-filed Acceptance Criteria do not carry it.