This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The glossary's detection reading compares the shipped tree with the claim record; itd-86's cold reading detects contradictions inside one document

issuewontfixmajoriss-2610262042256389

The glossary's detection reading compares the shipped tree with the claim record; itd-86's cold reading detects contradictions inside one document

A terminology drift (severity major) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/ledger/position.md:17 — "the detection pass (gaps between the shipped tree and the claim record)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-86-cold-reading-surface.md:29 — "A surface that takes exactly one target document and produces candidate detections against the constraints visible in that document alone."

The position entry fixes the detection position of a cold reading as gaps between the shipped tree and the claim record. itd-86 names a cold reading that takes exactly one document and produces detections only against that document's own constraints. The same instrument name and the same word, detection, are given an incompatible object, so someone building from itd-86 would build a different instrument from the one the ledger glossary defines.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1068.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. itd-86 was the originating one-document draft; itd-184 says the single-document cold reading generalises to four positions, and itd-199 names the loss and restores a document as a valid scope. The glossary follows the shipped intents, and nobody builds from itd-86.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262042256389
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severitymajor

References1

mentions3