Development record
The glossary forbids calling a cold reading a review; itd-90 says the cold reading reviews a document
issueopennitpickiss-2610262042269640
The glossary forbids calling a cold reading a review; itd-90 says the cold reading reviews a document
A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/glossary/ledger/cold-reading.md:25— "Do not call a cold reading a review or an audit: a review weighs and recommends, and a reading is forbidden both." - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-90-brief-interview-for-the-blanks.md:40— "That surface reviews a document for internal contradictions and is deliberately denied context."
The cold-reading entry lists review as a forbidden synonym and says a review weighs and recommends, which a reading may not do. itd-90 describes the cold reading of itd-86 as a surface that reviews a document, using the forbidden word for the very instrument the entry defines.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1069.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262042269640 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262042269640-the-glossary-forbids-calling-a-cold.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-90The Product Thinker Is Handed Exactly The Questions Only They Can Answer — And Nothing Elserelated
mentions1
- itd-86abcd Can Read Its Own Design Documents As A Stranger Would