Development record
The glossary keeps disposition apart from the issue ledger's resolved and wontfix; itd-87 calls resolved and wontfixed entries dispositioned
issueopenminoriss-2610262042279476
The glossary keeps disposition apart from the issue ledger's resolved and wontfix; itd-87 calls resolved and wontfixed entries dispositioned
A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/glossary/ledger/disposition.md:25— "Do not reuse the issue ledger's open, resolved and wontfix." - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-87-recurrence-escalation-in-capture.md:31— "Matching an incoming capture against dispositioned entries (resolve,wontfix), not merely against open ones."
The disposition entry says a disposition is not a resolution and must not reuse the issue ledger's open, resolved and wontfix. itd-87 uses dispositioned to mean exactly an issue resolved or wontfixed, so the term carries two senses across the record.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1070.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262042279476 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262042279476-the-glossary-keeps-disposition-apart.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-87A Finding That Comes Back After You Closed It Tells You Something, And abcd Stops Throwing It Awayrelated